Skip to content

A visual briefing

Sarasota in 15 charts

The whole story, one insight at a time. Every figure below comes from the county's own audited financial reports, adopted budgets, and published board minutes — the same locked datasets behind the rest of this site. Scroll it, or present it.

A simple rule for reading any chart here: multiply a per-person figure by four for a family of four.

*FY2026 figures are pro forma — projected from the budget the board itself adopted. The audited FY2026 ACFR (the county's annual audited financial report, due early 2027) supersedes them. Full methodology and downloads

The hockey stick: $3,229 to $6,002 per person

County spending plus debt per person was essentially flat for seven years — then bent sharply upward starting FY2023.

What this means for residents: The all-in cost of county government per person nearly doubled in four budgets after barely moving for seven years.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

Both halves grew: spending and debt per person

This is not just borrowing or just spending — both lines rise together after FY2022.

What this means for residents: You cannot attribute the increase to one bad decision; the operating budget and the debt load climbed side by side.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

A family of four: $12,916 to $24,008 a year

The same trajectory in household terms — the number a family actually carries.

What this means for residents: A family of four's share of county government grew by $9,416 a year in just the four budgets since FY2022.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

The same chart, annotated: whose budgets are these?

Neunder and Smith were elected November 2022. FY2023 was their first full fiscal year — every bar to the right of the line is a budget this board adopted.

Sarasota County government only — spending per person (solid) stacked with debt outstanding per person (faded) = all-in per person. Blue: before Neunder & Smith. Red: their four full years. Hatched: FY2026 pro forma*.

What this means for residents: Trajectories have owners. The years of acceleration are precisely the years this board has controlled the budget.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

Population grew 22% — spending grew 121%

Indexed to FY2016 = 100: population reaches 122 while spending reaches 221. Growth explains only a fraction of the increase.

What this means for residents: 'We're growing' cannot account for the spending curve. If spending had merely tracked population, the per-person figure would be flat.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

Where the new money went

The eight largest departmental increases from FY2023 actual to FY2026 adopted, ranked in dollars.

What this means for residents: These are the specific lines that grew — the places to start asking whether each increase bought a measurable result.

Source: county budget line items, FY2023 actual vs FY2026 adopted, cleaned of accounting reclassifications.

Debt outstanding: $625.5M to $1.45B

Total county debt outstanding was flat-to-falling before FY2023, then grew sharply.

What this means for residents: Debt is spending that hasn't been paid for yet. Every dollar borrowed today is a claim on future budgets — and future tax bills.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

Debt per person: $1,566 to $2,982

Population growth did not dilute the debt — the per-person share rose anyway. (This is debt outstanding per person; annual debt-service payments are not in the locked series.)

What this means for residents: Each resident's share of what the county owes grew even as more residents arrived to share it.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

It gets worse: add the four cities

The county line is only part of the bill. Stack all five local governments and the FY2026 figure rises from $6,002 to $10,420 per person.

What this means for residents: If you live in Sarasota, North Port, Venice, or Longboat Key, you pay a city government on top of the county — the full local burden is far larger than either alone.

Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget. Source: locked stacked series — all five local governments' ACFRs and adopted budgets.

Wave 1 savings vs. one year of growth

The board-approved budget grew an average of $162.3M a year over the term. Wave 1 of the savings menu — no layoffs, no service cuts — is worth $30.15M to $83.64M a year.

What this means for residents: The immediately available savings are the same order of magnitude as an entire year's spending growth. This is not rounding error — it is a real alternative.

Source: LGAI savings model — benchmarks applied to audited FY2026 budget bases. Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.

The Top 10 Quick Wins, ranked

Earliest wave first, then the largest guaranteed floor. The solid bar is the conservative low estimate; the faded bar is the upper range.

What this means for residents: These are specific, named tactics with budget lines attached — not slogans. Any commissioner could put any of them on an agenda.

Source: LGAI savings model — benchmarks applied to audited FY2026 budget bases.

$49.85M to $140.5M a year, in six areas

The full savings menu by area. Procurement alone is worth more than the next four areas combined.

What this means for residents: Recovering even the low end is $102 per resident, every year — without touching a single service.

Source: LGAI savings model — benchmarks applied to audited FY2026 budget bases.

How the board votes on money

Share of motions passed with zero No votes, by category (motion counts in parentheses). Fiscal items — spending, tax, debt — sail through nearly untouched; what little dissent exists concentrates in land use.

What this means for residents: Of 992 recorded motions, 2 failed. Every millage rate and final budget adoption passed. The spending trajectory is not contested inside the chamber — which is why it falls to residents to contest it outside.

Source: the board's own published minutes — all 992 recorded motions, Nov 2022 to present.

The Real Local Burden: County + Four Cities

The county's all-in cost is $24,008 per family of four. Add the four cities — City of Sarasota, North Port, Venice, and Longboat Key — and the true local-government total reaches $41,680. FY2026, spending plus debt.

What this means for residents: Conventional state rankings compare county governments only and ignore the cities layered on top — so no published ranking captures this combined figure. If you live here, the stacked number is the one your household actually carries. Almost no one else publishes it this way.

Source: locked county and combined county + cities series — audited ACFRs and adopted budgets for all five governments, FY2026 adopted basis.

What Wave 1 would do to your bill

If the board adopted just Wave 1, a family of four's FY2026 share would drop by $247 to $686 a year. Illustrative: savings applied directly to the per-family figure.

What this means for residents: This is the before-and-after of a single board vote — no layoffs, no service reductions, just contracts re-bid, licenses audited, and debt refinanced.

Source: LGAI savings model — benchmarks applied to audited FY2026 budget bases. Source: locked county series — audited ACFRs FY2016–FY2025; FY2026 pro forma from the adopted budget.